Wedding Dress

From the scandalous Cher of 1986 to the absurd Kim Basinger in 1990, up to the divine Julia Roberts and the split of Angelina Jolie in 2012. These are the unforgettable Oscar looks. (Read also: red carpet look)
Some clothes have made people dream, others have shocked or scandalized. Let's see together those that have remained most impressed in the collective memory.


Among the most elegant of all time there are Julia Roberts, Sharon Stone, Gwyneth Paltrow, Nicole Kidman, Angelina Jolie (except for the damn phase of the early years). More recently, Kate Hudson, Penelope Cruz, Anne Hathaway, and Jennifer Lawrence. The most elegant colors remain the classic white, black, red and gold. (See the gallery)
Scandalosa Cher: In 1986 he presented himself with a Bob Mackie dress red dresses bridesmaid, exaggeratedly bizarre and nonconformist. Porcupine wig on the head, belly and navel in plain sight, lustrine and pailettes in profusion. The actress seemed to have gone out of her show in Las Vegas. Criticatissimo. In 1988 he bets with another transparent dress at the edge of decency. Relapse!

Surreal Kim Basinger: In 1990, the beautiful actress, who has never shone for choice of look, comes with a wedding dress signed by herself. Unwatchable!

Costly Nicole Kidman: In 1997 the Australian actress presented a 2 million dollar dress, produced by the Christian Dior Haute Couture house. And this little dress pink cocktail dresses under 50 dollars, with its golden green color and the neckline reminiscent of the oriental style, became one of the most talked and remembered dresses in the history of the Oscars
Vintage Julia Roberts: In 2001 the actress wore a black and white Valentino dress, and won the Oscar for Best Actress for her performance in Erin Brockovich. It was the first in the history of the Oscars to wear a vintage dress. According to a poll published in the Daily Telegraph, it turned out to be the third most iconic dress to appear on the red carpet.

Good evening, I would like to ask what my father's rights are. I am separated (not married) I have a 7 year old son. It's been 5 years since the child is with the mother, who went abroad for a period of almost a year, so I could not see him. Then in the holidays I can not see it (birthday, Christmas and more). I spend a maintenance of € 150 a month, just for food because clothes or gifts like toys I buy them apart, I work part time 25 hours a week, I have to pay my wife and two children plus my mother to my country.
I would like to know how much I have to spend with my son, how many times a year can I see him (provided until now I have seen him twice in 2015 and now I should wait for school holidays because my mother does not want me to take him for a weekend so I see him only two or three times, I live in Milan and he now lives in San Benedetto del Tronto (he used to live in Milan).

The problem that I submit is composed of two distinct themes, certainly linked to each other, but certainly not proportional. There is in fact no correlation between the quantum of the maintenance allowance and your right of visit.
As regards exclusively the economic part white wedding dress with black lace, the obligation to contribute to the needs of the children weighs on both parents in proportion of their financial resources. Being the minor entrusted to the mother, who then provides for maintenance in direct form, you will have the obligation to pay a monthly allowance, as indeed already does. The judge, in determining the amount of the allowance for the child, considers the "current needs of the child", which are realized, not only, in the needs, but also in the legitimate aspirations of the child and, more generally in his prospects of life.

Assuming that a monthly allowance of € 150 is already to be considered quite small, if its economic condition has undergone (obviously pejorative) changes, such as a sizeable or significant reduction in the paycheck, or even if its family loads have increased ( for example, for the birth of a new child) from the moment when the judge has established the amount of the allowance blue white wedding dresses, you can certainly request a reduction, even if it is objectively unlikely that you can fall below 100 € monthly.

Amal Alamuddin, George Clooney's wife mermaid evening dresses, shows the tummy at the United Nations. The lawyer for human rights gave a speech at the UN headquarters, in order to ask the nations to investigate the crimes committed by ISIS in some countries. Mrs. Clooney appeared radiant, wrapped in a soft yellow dress with black details.


Pregnancy seems to give to Amal who, despite having twins, has not stopped working. 39 years she, 55 him: Amal and George get ready to become parents, between trepidation, joy and some fear. According to the latest news from sources close to the couple, the twins will be a boy and a girl and should be born in June. After so many gossip and whispered gossip, a few weeks ago the Hollywood actor decided to comment on his wife's pregnancy, talking about the thrill of becoming a dad, even more than twins.

"We are very happy and very excited. It will be a great adventure - said George Clooney -. We welcomed the news with joy are cocktail dresses long or short, with open arms ". The actor also said that when he gave the announcement, none of his friends seemed to believe it. On the other hand, at 55, Clooney seems to have abandoned the idea of having a child, but Amal seems to have changed his mind, so much so that now he is ready to face this great adventure and to be a father to the children who will arrive.

"I will be 56 years old when they were born," he said, claiming he took as a model Jean-Paul Belmondo, who became a father even at the age of 70. The love for the lawyer of Lebanese origins seems to have completely changed Clooney who, as an inveterate playboy, turned into a perfect husband and soon into a loving family man.
Amal Alamuddin, with his elegance, the tenacity with which he defends his battles (he also defended Julian Assange, leader of Wikileaks) and his charm, has been able to conquer the most desired bachelor of America. The two got married in 2014, with a very luxurious ceremony in Venice, a city to which Clooney is particularly close.

Choosing your own bouquet is one of those activities that loads every bride with Hamlet doubts. On the other hand it is one of the icons of the Big Day and the possibilities are really thousands, so choose the flowers that will best match with the rest that has already been chosen, it is never really simple.
So here are some possibilities that, we are sure, will give you some further indication and maybe advise you on which choice can best suit your style. Ideas that do not depend only on the choice of the flower, but also and above all by your personality.
1. Boho-chic brides
For the perfect boho-chic bride cocktail green dress, green is necessary because it becomes a trademark to mix flowers and leaves in winter as in summer because it recalls nature. The advice is therefore: small rosebuds, to be alternated with eucalyptus leaves.

2. Original brides
If you focus on the exclusivity of an unrepeatable bouquet, the suggestion is to use seasonal fruit, perhaps choosing small sprigs of berries to embellish it. Another possibility could be offered by succulents, of those particularly soft and tapered types.
3. Minimalist brides
The minimal-chic is the undisputed trend of this year and, if you feel part of this together, a simple bouquet with small flowers composed of daisies, daffodils or roses, seems to be tailor-made.
4. Sophisticated brides
On the contrary, if your favorite look is that of the aristocratic bride and you have in mind a highly sought-after dress, the bouquet could more easily be adapted by choosing a classic style, which allows you to indulge in size and shape.
5. Stylish brides
For you a long bouquet composed of lavender flowers. This will emphasize your modern spirit.
6. Classic brides
Roses are the flowers of the romantic bride par excellence, but extraordinary alternatives can be offered by peonies.

May 22, 2018 - When we talk about violence against women we generally refer to rape or beatings. There are, however, other forms of abuse, those "invisible" Gillne, which should not be underestimated and are often a prelude to physical violence. Small or large daily gestures that condition the fair sex. The woman is struck in her psyche, in her self-esteem, in her soul.
Between the walls of the house, it happens that man, to prevail in an argument, slams the door, breaks a plate, screams at close range and insults. They are all intimidating attitudes that cause discomfort in the person who suffers them and that should not be tolerated because they represent indirect violence.

Another widespread "scheme" is represented by isolation. To make one's partner feel guilty because he has a social life, forbid him the freedom to cultivate any friendship with male persons. Or, more simply, spend an afternoon with your mother or go out for an aperitif with your friends. Man tries to erase all relationships, creating a dependency relationship in which his victim is unable to say no for fear.

For the same dynamic, the woman does not have the courage to wear that dress that she likes so much because the partner finds it "too sexy" blue and green bridesmaid dresses, even though in reality it is not so much. And even if he loves sports, he renounces the gym because he "does not trust those who go there".

All these behaviors are justified with the most disparate excuses: a too stressful period at work, a trauma immediately when young, a parental lack. But there are no valid reasons for "letting go". Because a man who loves us above all respects us. When it does not happen, the relationship must be truncated.

Even outside the walls of the house, a woman is not immune to "invisible violence" and endures - almost like a tax to pay - sexist comments and vulgar appreciation of her appearance. How many times a girl while walking is harassed by a man behind the wheel? And how many times while he moves among the crowd at the disco is touched by a stranger against his will?